Digital Technology in School Administration: An Exploratory Study from Ghana's Kpone-Katamanso Municipal District
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53103/cjess.v5i6.426Keywords:
School Administration, Digital Technologies, Operational Efficiency, Student Information Systems, Record Keeping, Scheduling; Data Quality, Coordination, Ghana, Developing Countries, TOE, TAM, Phenomenology, Public SchoolsAbstract
This study examines how digital technologies influence operational efficiency in public school administration within Kpone-Katamanso Municipal, Ghana. Guided by an interpretivist, phenomenological design, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 purposively selected administrators directly involved in record-keeping, communication, and scheduling. The research asked how the adoption of digital tools affects the speed, accuracy and coordination of routine administrative tasks. Findings indicate that centralised student‑information systems, asynchronous messaging and shared scheduling tools compress lead times, reduce data errors and improve cross‑role coordination. Reported gains were contingent on reliable connectivity and power, consistent platform uses and light‑touch governance (role‑based access, basic change logging, periodic data‑quality checks). The study recommends phased investment in integrated platforms, practice‑centred coaching and simple governance routines, and outlines indicators schools can use to track gains. Limitations include reliance on self-reported perceptions and a single-district focus; future work should triangulate with system logs and time-and-motion data.
Downloads
References
Adeoye, I., & Afolabi, A. (2019). Digital platforms and administrative efficiency in Nigerian schools. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(4), 769–785. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-12-2018-0374
Alenezi, A. (2023). Factors influencing educational technology implementation in Middle Eastern schools: A TOE perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 1235–1256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11234-5
Alshamaila, Y., Papagiannidis, S., & Li, F. (2013). Cloud computing adoption by SMEs in the North East of England: A TOE perspective. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 26(3), 250–275. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410391311325225
Al-Zu'bi, Z. (2020). Implementing student information systems in Jordanian secondary schools. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5039–5062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10195-w
Ampadu, E., Mordi, C., & Simpson, R. (2020). The role of academic libraries in Ghana’s higher education: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(2), Article 102145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102145
Anderson, T., Krathwohl, D., & Mayer, R. (2022). Analytics in education administration: A review. Journal of Educational Administration, 60(4), 345–368. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-11-2021-0198
Baker, E. (2012). A framework for institutional technology adoption. Journal of Information Systems, 26(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-10284
Barua, A., Kriebel, C. H., & Mukhopadhyay, T. (2004). Information technology and business value: An analytic and empirical investigation. Information Systems Research, 15(1), 13–32. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0010
Baxter, G., & Sommerville, I. (2011). Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering. Interacting with Computers, 23(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.07.003
British Educational Research Association. (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.). BERA.
Boateng, R., & Dzidonu, C. (2022). Mobile platforms for school administration in Ghana. African Journal of Information Systems, 14(3), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajis.v14i3.4
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2000). Beyond computation: Information technology, organisational transformation and business performance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.4.23
Chen, L., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Integrating student information systems: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 197, Article 104699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104699
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organisational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
Dahya, N., Dryden-Peterson, S., & Douhaibi, D. (2023). Technology integration in refugee education: Lessons from Jordan and Lebanon. Comparative Education Review, 67(1), 89–115. https://doi.org/10.1086/722567
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organisational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Ghana Education Service. (2022). Annual ICT in schools report. Ghana Education Service.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Hennessy, S., Rojas-Drummond, S., Higham, R., Márquez, A. M., Maine, F., Ríos, R. M., García-Carrión, R., Torreblanca, O., & Barrera, M. J. (2022). Developing a coding scheme for analysing classroom dialogue across educational contexts. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 9, 16–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.01.001
Johnson, P., & Lee, S. (2023). Communication platforms in school administration: Efficiency and engagement outcomes. Computers & Education, 192, Article 104667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104667
Kahn, B. K., & Strong, D. M. (1998). Product and service performance model for information quality: An update. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Quality, 102–115.
King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43(6), 740–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003
Kumar, R., & Singh, M. (2023). Optimising school timetables with intelligent scheduling systems. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 52(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395221115678
Lai, C., Wang, Q., & Lei, J. (2023). Determinants of school technology adoption: A cross-national study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(2), 488–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13245
Larusson, J. A., & Whitehead, P. (2019). Learning analytics for administrators: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 101–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9761-z
Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2020). Management information systems: Managing the digital firm (16th ed.). Pearson.
Leonardi, P. M. (2011). When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.2307/23043493
Li, X., & Ma, Q. (2020). Barriers to technology integration in Chinese secondary schools. Computers & Education, 143, Article 103617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103617
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: A literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1
Martinez, A., Rodriguez, C., & Thompson, K. (2022). Digital transformation in educational administration: A longitudinal study. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(3), 412–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220965568
Msila, V. (2023). Digital literacy in school administration: Challenges and opportunities in South African contexts. South African Journal of Education, 43(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v43n1a2089
Ndlovu, M., & Maphosa, C. (2022). Organisational culture and educational technology adoption in Southern African schools. Africa Education Review, 19(2), 122–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2021.1994156
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness and credibility of research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Oliveira, T., & Martins, M. F. (2011). Literature review of information technology adoption models at firm level. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 14(1), 110–121.
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organisations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.398
Ouma, S., & Awuor, F. (2022). Interoperability challenges in African school information systems. Information Development, 38(4), 625–639. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669211035421
Patel, R., Singh, A., & Zhou, L. (2022). Adoption of messaging platforms in educational institutions. Computers in Human Behavior, 134, Article 107316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107316
Patton, M. Q. (2017). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Pettersson, F. (2021). Understanding digitalisation and educational change in school by means of activity theory and the levels of learning concept. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10239-8
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Sánchez-Santamaría, J., Olmos-Migueláñez, S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2018). Decision-support systems for educational data mining in university learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.027
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modelling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
Sharda, R., Delen, D., & Turban, E. (2018). Business intelligence, analytics, and data science: A managerial perspective (4th ed.). Pearson.
Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., Prakasam, N., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). The battle of brain vs heart: A literature review and meta-analysis of “hedonic motivation” use in UTAUT2. International Journal of Information Management, 46, 222–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.04.017
Taylor, P. (2017). Addressing the digital divide in rural schools: A comprehensive policy review. Journal of Rural and Remote Education, 32(2), 45–59.
Tondeur, J., Aesaert, K., Pynoo, B., van Braak, J., Fraeyman, N., & Erstad, O. (2022). Developing a comprehensive picture of 21st century ICT competences: A systematic literature review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(4), 577–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington Books.
Trucano, M. (2016). Educational technology in developing countries: A brief guide. World Bank Publications.
UNESCO. (2019). ICT in education: A global perspective. UNESCO Publishing.
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance on digital transformation in education systems. UNESCO Publishing.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Wanjiku, J., & Mukwa, C. (2023). Phased educational technology implementations in Kenyan schools. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 19(2), 45–61.
Weiner, B. J. (2009). A theory of organisational readiness for change. Implementation Science, 4(1), Article 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-67
Wilson, G., Ahmed, S., & Powell, M. (2023). Administrative technologies in schools: A systematic review of efficiency outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 93(4), 612–646. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543221145367
Wisdom, J. P., Chor, K. H. B., Hoagwood, K. E., & Horwitz, S. M. (2014). Innovation adoption: A review of theories and constructs. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 41(4), 480–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0486-4
Yaseen, H., Dingley, K., & Adams, C. (2023). Capturing the growth of mobile learning in developing countries: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(2), 435–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10165-4
Zina, M. (2021). Student engagement in quality assurance and accreditation processes: A global perspective. Quality in Higher Education, 27(2), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2020.1832861
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aaron Adjei, Evans Kwashie Kagbetor, Grace Damengua, Light Zaglago

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published by CJESS are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This license permits third parties to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon the original work provided that the original work and source is appropriately cited.
