Decoding the Myths of the Native and Non-Native English Teachers on the Language Acquisition of Turkish Post-Secondary Students

Seyed Javad Roudehchi Tabrizi; Samar Goldouz

doi:10.53103/cjess.v3i5.167

Authors

Seyed Javad Roudehchi Tabrizi Ankara University, Turkey
Samar Goldouz Islamic Azad University, Iran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53103/cjess.v3i5.167

Keywords:

NNESTs, NESTs, EFL Students, Perception

Abstract

There is a prevalent belief among individuals that the optimal approach to acquiring a second language (L2) is through instruction provided by native English-speaking teachers (NESTs). The objective of this research was to investigate the perspectives of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students at the post-secondary level regarding the instructional competencies of non-native English-speaking teachers (NNESTs) and native English-speaking teachers (NESTs). The study comprised a sample of 30 Turkish students who were learning English as a foreign language. The sample included 17 female and 13 male participants who were selected from post-secondary students enrolled in ANKU (Ankara University Development Foundation Private Anatolian & Science High School). Participants were required to have a minimum of 27 hours of weekly English language instruction. The participants were selected through the convenience sampling method. The present study utilized semi-structured interviews as the primary data collection instrument, with a total of 30 participants being interviewed. The investigator conducted individual, semi-structured interviews at the English Language Department of Foreign Languages. The data collection process consisted of five interview sessions, each of which lasted for 90 minutes. Thematic analysis (TA) was utilized to examine the interview data. The results of the current investigation indicate that non-native English-speaking teachers (NNESTs) have the potential to offer more effective feedback compared to their native English-speaking counterparts (NESTs). Furthermore, non-Native English-Speaking Teachers (NNESTs) possess superior abilities in instructing writing and grammar compared to Native English-Speaking Teachers (NESTs), and they exhibit a proficient understanding of pedagogical techniques. Conversely, non-native English-speaking teachers (NESTs) exhibited exceptional linguistic aptitude and demonstrated fluency in their use of language. Additionally, non-native English-speaking teachers (NESTs) served as a significant source of inspiration for English language learners, and they exhibited greater efficacy in instructing oral communication and auditory comprehension abilities than non-native English-speaking teachers (NNESTs). The study's implications were presented in the paper's conclusion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akinmulegun, T. E, & Kunt, N. (2022). Identity formation of non-native English-speaking teachers and prospective teachers through perceptions towards native-speakerism: the Turkish Cypriot story. South African Journal of Education, 42(1), 1-9.

Alghofaili, N. M., & Elyas, T. (2017). Decoding the myths of the native and non-native English speakers teachers (NESTs & NNESTs) on Saudi EFL tertiary students. English Language Teaching, 10 (6), 1-11.

Al-Nawrasy, O. (2013). The effect of native and non-native English language teachers on secondary students’ achievement in speaking skills. Jordan Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(2), 243-254.

Alqahtani, M. H. (2022). Blame the Message Senders Not the Messenger: The Defence Case of the English “Native Speaker” Teacher. Hindawi, Education Research International, 1-11.

Alseweed, M. A., & Daif-Allah, A. S. (2012). University students' perceptions of the teaching effectiveness of native and nonnative teachers of English in the Saudi context. Language In India, 12(7), 35.

Arvizu, M. N. G. (2014). Students’ beliefs and expectations of native and non-native English teachers. Mextesol Journal, 38(3), 1405-3470.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Razavieh (2014). Introduction to research in education (9th ed.). Wadsworth.

Barry, C. (2011). English language teaching in Brunei: A view through a critical lens. RELC Journal, 42(2), 203-220.

Beckett, G. H., & Stiefvater, A. (2009). Change in ESL graduate students’ perspectives on non-native English-speaker teachers. TESL Canada Journal, 27(1), 27-46.

Benke, E. & Medgyes, P. (2005). Differences in teaching behaviour between native and non-native speaker teachers: As seen by the learners. In E. Llurda (Ed.), Non- Native Language Teachers: Perceptions, Challenges and Contributions to the Profession (pp.195-215). New York, NY: Springer.

Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., and Polinsky, M. (2013). Heritage languages and their speakers: opportunities and challenges for linguistics. Theoretical Ling. 39, 121–189.

Braine, G. (1999). Non-Native Educators in English Language Teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Canado, M. L. P., & Madrid, D. (2004). Teacher and student preferences of native and non-native foreign language teachers. Porta Linguarum, 2, 125-138.

Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Massachusette, MIT Press.

Coulmas, F. (1981). Spies and native speakers. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), A Festschrift for Native Speaker (pp. 355-367). The Hague: Mouton.

de Dios Martínez Agudo, J., & Robinson, I. (2014). Native or non-native? The nativeness factor from the EFL student teachers' perspective Utrecht Studies in Language & Communication, 27.

Dewaele, J.-M. (2018a). Glimpses of semantic restructuring of English emotion-laden words of American English L1 users residing outside the USA. Ling. Approaches Bilingu. 8, 320–342.

Diaz, N. R. (2015). Students’ preferences regarding native and non-native teachers of English at a university in the French Brittany. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93-97.

Elyas, T., & Picard, M. (2013). Critiquing of higher education policy in Saudi Arabia: towards a newneoliberalism. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 6(1), 3-41.

Guerra, L. (2009). Teaching and Learning English as an International Language in Portugal. Policy, Practice and Perceptions. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.

Guerra, L. (2017). Native and Non-Native Teachers in English Language Classrooms. In Agudo, J. D. D. M. (Ed.), Students’ Perceptions and Expectations of Native and Non-Native Speaking Teachers, (pp.183-205). Berlin, De Gruyter Inc.

Haque, M. N., & Sharmin, S. (2022). Perception of Saudi Students about Non-Native English Teachers and Native English Teachers in Teaching English at Jazan University. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(3), 503-514.

Holliday, A. (2006). Native-speakerism. ELT Journal, 60(4), 385-387.

Koşar, G. (2018). Turkish tertiary level students’ perceptions of native English speaking teachers and non-native English speaking teachers. European Journal of English langauge Teaching, 4(1), 96-119.

Larasati, A., Prihatin, Y., & Sumartono, H. (2022). Students’ Perceptions: Bilingual Language Used in EFL Classroom. In 2nd International Conference on Social Science, Humanities, Education and Society Development. Atlantis Press.

Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2002). University students’ perceptions of native and nonnative speaker teachers of English. Language Awareness, 11, 132-142.

Levis, J. M., Sonsaat, S., Link, S., & Barriuso, T. A. (2016). Native and nonnative teachers of L2 pronunciation: Effects on learner performance. TESOL Quarterly, 50(4), 894-931.

Liang, J. (2003). Models of NNESTs’ teacher development: Rethinking the NS/NSS dichotomy. NNEST Newsletter, 5(2), 1-5.

Lipovsky, C., & Mahboob, A. (2010). students’ appraisal of their native and non-native English speaker teachers. WATESOL NNEST Caucus Annual Review, 1, 119-154.

Ma, F., & Ping, L. (2012). Advantages and disadvantages of native and non-native-English-speaking teachers: Student perceptions in Hong Kong. TESOL Quarterly, 46(2), 280-305.

Mahboob, A. (2004). Native or nonnative: What do students enrolled in an intensive English program think? In L. D. Kamhi-Stein (Ed.), Learning and teaching from experience (pp. 121-148). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Medgyes, P. (1992). Native or nonnative: who’s worth more? ELT Journal, 46(4), 340- 349.

Medgyes, P. (1999). The Non-Native Teacher (2nd Ed.). Germany: Hueber.

Rao, Z. (2010). Chinese students’ perceptions of native English-speaking teachers in EFL teaching. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Developmen, 31(1), 55- 68.

Shobeiry, M., Alavi, S. M., & Kaivanpanah, S. (2023). Iranian English Learners' Perception of Native and Non-native English Teachers in New Zealand and Iran: A Multilingual Identity Perspective. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills), 42(1), 91-119. doi: 10.22099/tesl.2023.45049.3153

Tajeddin, Z., Atai, M. R., Shayeghi, R. (2019). Native and non-native teachers’ changing beliefs about teaching English as an International Language. International Journal of society, Culture, & Language,7(2), 1-14.

Thráinsson, H. (2012). “Ideal speakers and other speakers: The case of dative and Some other cases,”. In Variation in Datives. eds. B. Fernandez and R. Etxepare (Cambridge, UK: Oxford University Press), 161–188.

Walkinshaw, I., & Oanh, D. H. (2014). Native and non-native English language teachers: Student perceptions in Vietnam and Japan. SAGE publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014534451.

Walkinshaw, I., & Oanh, D.H. (2012). Native or non-native English speaking teachers in Vietnam: Weighing the benefits. TESL-EJ.

Wang, L., & Fang, F. (2021). Native-speakerism policy in English language teaching revisited: Chinese university teachers’ and students’ attitudes towards native and non-native English-speaking teachers. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1778374.

Zurrahmi, U., & Triastuti, A. (2022). Indonesian EFL students’ perceptions of effective non-native English teachers. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(1), 299-317.