The use of Phonics Approach in Teaching Reading in Early Childhood Centers in the Bolgatanga Municipality

Francisca Atamakira Awanzirigo; Hamida Salifu Quendar; Michael Subbey

doi:10.53103/cjess.v6i4.510

Authors

Francisca Atamakira Awanzirigo University of Education, Ghana
Hamida Salifu Quendar University of Education, Ghana
Michael Subbey University of Education, Ghana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53103/cjess.v6i4.510

Keywords:

Reading, Phonics, Teachers, Centers, Early Childhood Education

Abstract

This study examined the use of phonics in teaching reading in early childhood centers in the Bolgatanga Municipality. It drew on two theoretical perspectives: the bottom-up and top-down theories of reading, and the sociocultural theory of learning, particularly the concepts of the zone of proximal development (ZPD), scaffolding, and mediation. The qualitative research approach and exploratory case study design were employed. Fourteen (14) teachers from five early childhood centers were selected as respondents through critical case (purposive) sampling technique. Data were collected through a focused group discussion guide and observation checklist, and analyzed using thematic and cross-case analytical procedures. The findings indicated that the teachers at the selected early childhood centers had gaps in their knowledge of phonics and adapted the use of multiple phonics methods in teaching reading. In light of the findings, it was recommended that, continual workshops and training sessions should be organized to update teachers on the evolving methodologies in phonics teaching; teachers in early childhood centers should emphasize diverse teaching strategies that integrate visual, auditory, and kinesthetic methods when combining phonics components; educational institutions and leadership should establish mentorship programmes where experienced teachers guide newcomers or colleagues facing challenges; and early childhood centers should begin phonics education at an early stage, possibly even before Kindergarten, to familiarize children with the fundamental concepts and as well, introduce phonics to teachers undergoing training in the colleges of education and universities in Ghana.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul-Razak, I. (2016). Using phonics as a method of teaching reading in basic schools. Journal of Educational Development and Practice, 7(2), 28-54.

Amadi, E. A. (2019). Bottom-up theory and phonics instruction: Implications for beginning reading. European Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies, 1(2).

Anderson, N. J. (2004). Metacognitive reading strategy awareness of ESL and EFL learners. The CATESOL journal, 16(1), 11-27.

Ankrah, G. K., Nyanta, D., & Opoku, K. (2017). Using the phonic method to improve the poor reading ability of pupils at Techiman Senior High School form one. European Journal of Education Studies.

Bar-On, A. (2004). Early childhood care and education in Africa: The case of Botswana. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 2(1), 67-84.

Brooks, G. (2023). Disputing recent attempts to reject the evidence in favour of systematic phonics instruction. Review of Education, 11(2), e3408.

Cieslinski, C. A. (2007). Kindergarten English language learners: Can we ensure a more successful start to school? (Doctor of Education) Temple University.

Crowe, S., Creswell, K., Robertson, A., Huby, G., Avery, A., & Sheikh, A. (2011). The case study approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(1), 1-9.

Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (Eds). (2002). Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Grant, M. (2014). Longitudinal study from reception to year 2: The effects of a systematic synthetic phonics programme on reading, writing, and spelling. Reading Reform Foundation. Retrieved 10/04/2023.

Lev_Vygotsky-libre.pdf (d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net) Retrieved 01/02/2023.

Lewis, M., & Ellis, S. (Eds.). (2006). Phonics: Practice, research, and policy. London: Sage.

Machin, S., McNally, S., & Viarengo, M. (2018). Changing how literacy is taught: Evidence on synthetic phonics. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 10(2), 217-41.

Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education, 9(3).

McMullin, C. (2023). Transcription and qualitative methods: Implications for third sector research. Voluntas, 34, 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00400-3.

Nyumba, O. T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 20-32.

Oduro, P., Mensah, F. A., Quansah, F., Lawer, R. A., & Ankoma-Sey, V. R. (2021). Understanding primary school teachers’ remediation strategies in assisting pupils with reading (phonic) difficulties. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 8(4), 189.

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Dickinson, W. B., Leech, N. L., & Zoran, A. G. (2009). A qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing data in focus group research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods,8(3), 1-21.

Ponelis, S. R. (2015). Using interpretive qualitative case studies for exploratory research in doctoral studies: A case of information systems research in small and medium enterprises. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 535.

Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications Ltd.

Saul, M. (2018). Lev Vygotsky.

Shaheen, M., Pradhan, S., & Ranajee, R. (2019). Sampling in qualitative research. In M. Gupta, M. Shaheen, & K. P. Reddy (eds.), Qualitative techniques for workplace data analysis. IGI Global DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-5366-3.

Stuart, M. (2006). Learning to read the words on the page: The crucial role of early phonics teaching. In M. Lewis & S. Ellis, S. (eds.) Phonics Practice, Research and Policy, 23-33.

Tenny, S., Brannan, G. D., Brannan, J. M., & Sharts-Hopko, N. C. (2017). Qualitative study. Qualitative Study - Abstract - Europe PMC Retrieved 25/03/2023

Torgerson, C., Brooks, G., & Hall, J. (2006). A systematic review of the research literature on the use of phonics in the teaching of reading and spelling. Nottingham: DfES Publications.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. London: The MIT Press.

Wyse, D., & Bradbury, A. (2022). Reading Wars or reading reconciliation? A critical examination of robust research evidence, curriculum policy, and teachers' practices for teaching phonics and reading. Review of Education, 10(1), e3314.

Wyse, D., & Bradbury, A. (2023). Teaching phonics and reading effectively:‘A balancing act’for teachers, policy makers and researchers. Review of Education, 11(3), e3429.

Zettler-Greeley, C. M., Bailet, L. L., Murphy, S., DeLucca, T., & Branum-Martin, L. (2018). Efficacy of the nemours brightStart! Early literacy programme: treatment outcomes from a randomized trial with at-risk prekindergartners. Early Education and Development, 29(6), 873-892.