Performance Assessment: Effective Tool Closing Academic Achievement Gap Between High and Low Ability Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53103/cjess.v2i6.78Keywords:
Performance Assessment, Tasks, High Ability Students, Low Ability Students, Students’ AchievementAbstract
Globally, bridging the achievement gap between low and high ability students in examinations have been the goal of educators. Academic achievement disparities among students have been one of the major reasons bedeviling the attainment of target by many schools in external examinations. This study aimed at using performance assessment to narrow the gap between high and low ability students’ achievement in tests. The descriptive survey was used to gather data from a 234 JHS students in Ahanta West Municipality obtained from a multi-stage sampling procedure. Teacher-made achievement tests were used to collect the data and were analysed with descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis of variance. Results of the analyses revealed that both high and low ability JHS students’ achievements in tests were improved when assessed with performance assessment. It was concluded that educators at JHS should be in the known that performance assessment is the tool for closing gaps between high and low ability students’ achievements in examinations. Therefore, assessors at the JHS level should adapt and integrate high percentage of performance assessment tasks in assessing students in order to close the gap between the low and high ability students’ achievement in the tests and examinations.
Downloads
References
Amedahe, F. K., & Asamoah-Gyimah, K. (2016). Introduction to measurement and evaluation. Hampton Press.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
Arhin, A. K. (2015). The effect of performance assessment-driven instruction on attitude and achievement of senior high school students in Mathematics in Cape Coast metropolis, Ghana. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(2), 109-116.
Ary, D., Jacob, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education. Cengage Learning.
Birenbaum, M., & Feldman, R. (1998). Relationship between learning patterns and attitudes towards two assessment formats. Educational Research, 40(1), 90-98.
Brookhart, S. M. (1997). Effects of the classroom assessment environment on mathematics and science achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 90 (6), 323-330.
Brooks, L. A. (1999). Adult ESL student attitude towards performance-based assessment. [Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Toronto].
Cohen, L., Manion, K., & Morrison, L. (2007). Research methods in education, (6th ed.). New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Demirel, Ö. (2007). Planning and evaluation in teaching. Pegem A Publishing.
Dzulkifli, M. A., & Alias, I. A. (2012). Students of low academic achievement their personality, mental abilities and academic performance: how counsellor can help? International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(23), 220 – 225.
EMIS Report. (2019). Educational directorate report. Ahanta West
Etsey, Y. K. A. (2012). Assessment in education. [Unpublished document, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast].
Fastre´, G. M. J., Van der Klink, M. R., van Merrie¨nboer, J. J. G. (2010). The effects of performance-based assessment criteria on student performance and self-assessment skills. Advance in Health Science Education, 15, 517–532.
Frey, B., & Schmitt, V. (2010). Teachers’ classroom assessment practices. Middle Grades Research Journal, 5(3), 107-117.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Karns, K., Hamlett, C. L., & Katzaroff, M. (1999). Mathematics performance assessment in the classroom: Effects on teacher planning and student problem solving. American Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 609-646.
Gagné, F. (2005). From gifts to talents: The DMGT as a developmental model. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidsson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 98- 119). Cambridge University Press.
Hallgren, K. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 23-34.
Herman, J. L., Aschbacher, P. R., & Winters, L. (1992). A practical guide to alternative assessment. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Jaglois, O. M., & Kitchel, A. (2014). Characteristics of high achieving students enrolled in an online economics course. The National Association for Business Teacher Education.
Khalanyane, T., & Hala-hala, M. (2014). Traditional assessment as a subjectification tool in schools in Lesotho. Educational Research and Reviews, 9(17), 587-593.
Khattri, N. Kane, M. B., & Reeve, A. L. (1995). How performance assessments affect teaching and learning. Educational Leadership, 53(3), 80-83.
Kim, S. (2005). Effects of implementing performance assessments on student learning: Meta-analysis using HLM. [Unpublished doctoral thesis, The Pennsylvania State University].
Koné, K (2015). The impact of performance-based assessment on university ESL learners' motivation. [Unpublished masters’ thesis, Minnesota State University, Mankato].
Lane, S. (2010). Performance assessment: The state of the art. (Scope student performance assessment series). Stanford University, Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
Lambert, D., & Lines, D. (2000). Understanding assessment. Routledge Falmer.
Leon, S. & Elias, M. (1998) A comparison of portfolio, performance, and traditional assessment in the middle school. Research in Middle Level Education Quarterly, 21(2), 21-37.
Madaus, G., & Dwyer, L. (1999). A short history of performance assessment: Lessons learned. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(9), 688-695.
Maier, A., Adams, J., Burns, D., Kaul, M., Saunders, M., & Thompson, C. (2020). Using performance assessments to support student learning: How district initiatives can make a difference. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute-learning. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/cpac-district-initiatives-assess-student.
McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. J. A. E. (2001). A comparison of high achievers’ and low achievers’ attitudes, perceptions, and motivations. Gifted Child Quarterly, 2, 71-76.
Meisels, S. J., Atkins-Burnett, S., Xue, Y., Bickel, D. D., & Son, S. (2003). Creating a system of accountability: The impact of instructional assessment on elementary children’s achievement test scores. Educational Policy Analysis Archieves, 11(9), 1-18.
Mellroth, E. (2014). High achiever! Always a high achiever? - A comparison of student achievements on mathematical tests with different aims and goals. [Unpublished licentiate thesis, Karlstad University Studies]
Meyer, C. A. (1992). What's the difference between authentic and performance assessment? Educational Leadership, 49(8), 39–40.
Ministry of Education (2012). Integrated Science for junior high school. CRDD.
Ministry of Education (2012). Mathematics for junior high school. CRDD.
Mueller, J. (2016). Authentic assessment tool box. http://jfmueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox
Mussawy, S. A. J. (2009). Assessment practices: Student’s and teachers’ perceptions of classroom assessment. [Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Massachusetts].
Nitko, A. J. (2001). Educational assessment of students (3rd ed.). Merrill Prentice Hall Inc.
Nursalam, Angriani, A. D., Darmawati, Baharuddin, & Aminuddin (2018). Developing test instruments for measurement of students’ high-order thinking skill on Mathematics in junior high school in Makassar. 2nd International Conference on Statistics, Mathematics, Teaching, and Research: Journal of Physics Conf. Series, 1028(012169) 1742-6596/1028/1/012169.
Oosterhof, A. (2001). Classroom application of educational measurement (3rd Ed.). Prentice Hall Inc.
Osterlind, S. (2006). Modern measurement: Theory, principles, and applications of mental appraisal. Pearson Prentice Hall.
Project Appleseed, the National Campaign for Public School Improvement (2018). Testing, testing [Brochure]. St. Louis, MO.
http://www.projectappleseed.org/#!assessment/cwvf
Quaigrain, K. & Arhin, A.K., (2017). Using reliability and item analysis to evaluate a teacher-developed test in educational measurement and evaluation. Educational Assessment & Evaluation. 4(1301013), 1 – 11.
Stevens-Fulbrook, P. (2019). 15 Lerning theories in education (A complete summary). http/ Home Best of teacherofsci.com
Tamakloe, E. K., Atta, E. T., & Amedahe, F. K., (2005). Principles and methods of teaching. Black Mask.
Taylor, C., Kokka, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Dieckman, J., Santana Pacheco, V., Sandler, S., & Bae, S. (2016). Student engagement: A framework for on-demand performance assessment tasks. Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
Wiggins, G. (1989). Teaching to the (authentic) test. Educational Leadership, 46(7), 41-47.
Wilson, M. S., & Peterson, P. L. (2006). Theories of learning and teaching what do they mean for educators? National Education Association.
Woodward, J., Monroe, K., Baxter, J. (2001). Enhancing student achievement on performance assessments in Mathematics. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 24(1), 33-46.
Yaduvanshi, S. & Singh, S. (2019). Fostering achievement of low-, average-, and high-achiever’s students in biology through structured cooperative learning (STAD method). Education Research International, 1(4), 1-10.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Abraham Gyamfi, Patience Langee, Abraham Yeboah, Isaac Adu Aboagye, Kingsley Kwasi Erzoah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published by CJESS are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This license permits third parties to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon the original work provided that the original work and source is appropriately cited.
