Power, Images, and Text: A Faircloughian CDA of a Gulf Foundation English Textbook
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53103/cjess.v6i3.485Keywords:
Critical Discourse Analysis, Textbook Images, Multimodal Analysis, Gulf ELT, Western DominanceAbstract
This study applies Norman Fairclough's three-dimensional critical discourse analysis (CDA) framework to examine images in a foundation-level English textbook used at Gulf universities for English for academic purposes (EAP). Guided by two research questions— (1) how key social groups (gender, nationality, role) are represented in images and their verbal-text interplay, and (2) ideologies/power relations in discursive and social practices—the analysis targets a multimodal page featuring Western professionals Sylvie Dam and Michael Morgan arranging a San Francisco conference trip. Textual findings reveal balanced gender (50% female/male in equal high-status roles) but ethnocentric Western dominance: blonde figures, suits, and urban skylines exclude Gulf/Arab or minority representations. Visual grammar shows equal salience, demand gaze, and symbiotic captions naturalizing professionals as ideal English users tied to grammar like "shall." Discursively, tasks emphasize comprehension over critique, sequencing within global corporate intertextuality absent local contexts. Socially, neoliberal globalism and Anglo-hegemony emerge, prioritizing employability over cultural relevance in Gulf EAP curricula. The study results echo Dabbagh (2016) on Westernized ELT visuals and Lestari (2025) on limited multimodal criticality, highlighting regional inclusivity gaps. Conclusions underscore images' ideological reproduction of power asymmetries. Recommendations include diversified imagery (e.g., Arab professionals), reflective tasks (e.g., "Oman adaptation"), teacher supplements, equity audits, and comparative corpus research to foster plural Englishes.
Downloads
References
Balaye Jam, S. Z., Khiabani, S. M., & Hejazi, M. (2021). Discourse Representation in the Images of English Textbooks" Prospects" and" Visions": A semiotic Analysis: The Case Study of Ethnicity and Place. Language Related Research, 11(6).
Benlaghrissi, H. (2023). Gender stereotypes in Moroccan EFL textbooks’ illustrations: Content and critical image analysis. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 14. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4431296
Bergstrand, K., & Jasper, J. M. (2018). Villains, victims, and heroes in character theory and affect control theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 81(3), 228-247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272518781050
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Dabbagh, A. (2016). Gender representation under critical image analysis: The case of Iranian ELT textbooks. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 4(4), 39-52. Retrieved from https://www.eltsjournal.org/archive/Value4%20Issue4/4-4-4-16.pdf
Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse & society, 4(2), 133-168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002002
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368
Fairclough, N. (2023). Critical discourse analysis. In The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 11-22). Routledge.
Farhadytooli, M. (2025). Studying the fundamental approaches to critical discourse analysis: Disclose the criticism of power and ideology. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research Studies, 5(2), 156-164. https://doi.org/10.55677/ijssers/V05I02Y2025-04
Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315819679
Hasan, M. R. (2020). Didactic symbol of visual images in EFL textbook: Multi modal critical discourse analysis. Pedagogy: Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 1–15. Institutional journal; https://doi.org/10.32332/pedagogy.v8i1.1959
Jancsary, D.C., Höllerer, M.A., & Meyer, R.E. (2016). Critical analysis of visual and multimodal texts. SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://research.wu.ac.at/ws/files/19828908/Dennis_etal_2016_SAGE-critical-analysis.pdf
Johnstone, B., & Andrus, J. (2024). Discourse analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003099857
Lestari, D. A. (2025). Critical thinking in multimodal ELT materials: A Discourse analysis of tasks and visuals in Bahasa Inggris Tingkat Lanjut (Grade XI). Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.47679/jrssh.v5i4.499
Liu, J. (2013). Visual images interpretive strategies in multimodal texts. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(6), 1259+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A353321490/AONE?u=anon~40018381&sid=googleScholar&xid=99a06577
Qazi, H. (2020). National identity in a postcolonial society: A foucauldian discourse analysis of Pakistan’s national curriculum textbooks and their social practices in schools for shaping students’ national belonging (Doctoral dissertation, University of Leicester).
Sitio, I. T., Sinar, T. S., & Rangkuti, R. (2023). Textbooks as value laden: A critical discourse analysis of moral values representation in primary school EFL textbooks. International Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 15(4), 98–112. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1409214
Snow, D. A. (2004). Framing processes, ideology, and discursive fields. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 380–412). Oxford: Blackwell.
Tajeddin, Z., & Janebi Enayat, M. (2010). Gender representation and stereotyping in ELT textbooks: A critical image analysis. Teaching English Language, 4(2), 51-79. https://doi.org/10.22132/tel.2010.66107
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Adnan Mohammed Bataineh, Kashif Ali Sabiri, Nazia Firdous, Amal Khalifa Alkaabi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published by CJESS are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This license permits third parties to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon the original work provided that the original work and source is appropriately cited.
