Building Trust and Recreating Community in Online Classrooms through Cultural Responsivity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53103/cjess.v5i1.291Keywords:
Trust, Cultural Responsivity, Cultural Historical Activity Theory, Online Learning CommunityAbstract
This paper investigates how five elementary school teachers established trust and recreated community for their online learners via cultural responsivity during the COVID-19 lockdowns in St. John’s, NL. The study adopts the Cultural Historical Activity Theory as a theoretical lens for this qualitative case study. The elementary school teachers in this sub-study are part of the Canadian section of the larger ADVOST project that promotes young children's inclusion and agency via culturally relevant arts and digital media. The research findings from analyzed interviews show that the elementary school teachers successfully fostered trust and emotional connections with their online students by creating inclusive, culturally responsive environments that foster collaboration, communication, and family involvement. Consequently, the researchers recommend adopting culturally responsive pedagogical practices and undertaking professional training on Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) with provisions for building trust and connection among online learners.
Downloads
References
Addy, T. M., Mitchell, K. A., & Dube, D. (2021). A tool to advance inclusive teaching efforts: The “who’s in class?” Form. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 22(3), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00183-21
Adnan, M., & Anwar, K. (2020). Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Students' perspectives. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 2(1), 45-51. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.2020261309
Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132-169. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311404435
Amerstorfer, C. M. (2021). Student perceptions of academic engagement and student-teacher relationships in problem-based learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 713057. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713057
Aucejo, E. M., French, J., Araya, M. P. U., & Zafar, B. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on student experiences and expectations: Evidence from a survey. Journal of Public Economics, 191, 104271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104271
Bao, W. (2020). COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113-115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191
Battery, S. (2003). The management and mismanagement of trust in education systems. Educational Management & Administration, 31(3), 245-261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X03031003003
Baturay, M. H., & Toker, S. (2019). The comparison of trust in virtual and face-to-face collaborative learning teams. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(3), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.601929
Bligh, B., & Flood, M. (2017). Activity theory in empirical higher education research: Choices, uses, and values. Tertiary Education and Management, 23(2), 125-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2017.1284258
Bottery, M. (2003). The management and mismanagement of trust. Educational Management & Administration, 31(3), 245-261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X03031003003 https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.3316/QRJ0902027/full/html
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Breuer, C., Hüffmeier, J., & Hertel, G. (2016). Does trust matter more in virtual teams? A meta-analysis of trust and team effectiveness considering virtuality and documentation as moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(8), 1151. https://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2016-25877-001.html
Collier, D. R., & Burke, A. (2021, January 11). Teachers are COVID heroes. It’s time we listened to them. The Tyee. https://thetyee.ca/Analysis/2021/01/11/Teachers-COVID-Heroes/
Cook, D. A. (2009). The failure of e-learning research to inform educational practice, and what we can do about it. Medical Teacher, 31(2), 158-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590802691393
Darby, F., & Lang, J. M. (2019). Small Teaching Online: Applying Learning Science in Online Classes. Jossey-Bass.
De Jong, P. G., Pickering, J. D., Hendriks, R. A., Swinnerton, B. J., Goshtasbpour, F., & Reinders, M. E. (2020). Twelve tips for integrating massive open online course content into classroom teaching. Medical Teacher, 42(4), 393-397. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1571569
Department of Education, NL (n.d.). Programs and Services: K-12 Education and Early Childhood Development. Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. https://www.gov.nl.ca/education
Dixson, M. D., Greenwell, M. R., Rogers-Stacy, C., Weister, T., & Lauer, S. (2017). Nonverbal immediacy behaviors and online student engagement: Bringing past instructional research into the present virtual classroom. Communication Education, 66(1), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1209222
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
Engeström, Y. (2014). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Epstein, J. L. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Fiorella, L., Stull, A. T., Kuhlmann, S., & Mayer, R. E. (2020). Fostering generative learning from video lessons: Benefits of instructor-generated drawings and learner-generated explanations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(5), 895-906. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/edu0000408
Foot, K. A. (2014). Cultural-Historical Activity Theory: Exploring a theory to inform practice and research. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 24(3), 329-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2013.831011
Ford, R. C., Piccolo, R. F., & Ford, L. R. (2017). Strategies for building effective virtual teams: Trust is key. Business Horizons, 60(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.08.009
Gallagher, M. A., Beck, J. S., Ramirez, E. M., Barber, A. T., & Buehl, M. M. (2023, August). Supporting multilingual learners’ reading competence: a multiple case study of teachers’ instruction and student learning and motivation. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 8, p. 1085909). Frontiers Media SA.
García, E., & Weiss, E. (2019). The teacher shortage is real, large, and growing, and worse than we thought. Economic Policy Institute. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED598211
Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2013). The community of inquiry theoretical framework. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (3rd ed., pp. 104-119). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203803738-12/community-inquiry-th-eoretical-framework-randy-garrison-zehra-akyol
Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2003). A theory of critical inquiry in online distance education. Handbook of distance education, 1(4), 113-127. https://creativity.a2hosted.com/masters/app/upload/users/3/3/my_files/3η/holberg1993.pdf#page=139
Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2), 147-166. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/15156/
Hai-Jew, S. (2007). The trust factor in online instructor-led college courses. Journal of Interactive Instruction Development, 19(3), 11-25. https://krex.k-state.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/804dd738-0e76-48e9-8550-31a190222036/content
Hammond, Z. (2015). Culturally responsive teaching and the brain: Promoting authentic engagement and rigor among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Corwin Press.
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2020). Professional capital after the pandemic: Revisiting and revising classic understandings of teachers' work. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 5(3/4), 327-336. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-06-2020-0039
Hasan, N., & Bao, Y. (2020). Impact of “e-Learning crack-up” perception on psychological distress among college students during COVID-19 pandemic: A mediating role of “fear of academic year loss”. Children and youth services review, 118, 105355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105355
Ikebuchi, S. (2023). Accessing education: Equity, diversity, and inclusion in online learning. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 49(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28349
Isohätälä, J., Näykki, P., & Järvelä, S. (2020). Cognitive and socio-emotional interaction in collaborative learning: Exploring fluctuations in students’ participation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(6), 831-851. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1623310
Jones, S. M., & Kahn, J. (2017). The evidence base for how we learn: Supporting students' social, emotional, and academic development. Aspen Institute National Commission on Social, Emotional, and Academic Development. https://www.aspeninstitute.org/publications/evidence-base-learn/
Kapasia, N., Paul, P., Roy, A., Saha, J., Zaveri, A., Mallick, R., ... & Chouhan, P. (2020). Impact of lockdown on learning status of undergraduate and postgraduate students during COVID-19 pandemic in West Bengal, India. Children and Youth Services Review, 116, 105194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105194
Ladson-Billings, G. (2021). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Lang, J. M. (2019). Small teaching: Everyday lessons from the science of learning (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Lockman, A. S., & Schirmer, B. R. (2020). Online instruction in higher education: Promising, research-based, and evidence-based practices. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 7(2), 130-15. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1258655
Lockman, A. S., & Schirmer, B. R. (2020). Online instruction in higher education: Promising, research-based, and evidence-based practices. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 7(2), 130-152.
Lowenthal, P. R. (2023). Synchronous tools for interaction and collaboration. In Handbook of open, distance and digital education (pp. 989-1002). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-981-19-2080-6_55.pdf
Lowenthal, P. R., & Dunlap, J. C. (2020). Social presence and online discussions: A mixed method investigation. Distance Education, 41(4), 490-514. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1821603
Mahdi, D. A. (2024). Effectiveness of LEP activities in enhancing EFL students' oral communication skills at King Khalid University. Saudi Journal of Language Studies, 4(1), 28-46. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/SJLS-10-2023-0047/full/html
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning Journal, 22(1), 205-222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
Martin, F., Oyarzun, B., & Sadaf, A. (2023). Higher Education Instructor Perception of Helpfulness of Inclusive and Equitable Online Teaching Strategies. Online Learning, 27(4), 144-170. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1412334
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey Bass.
Mitchell, A., & Zigurs, I. (2009). Trust in virtual teams: Solved or still a mystery?. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 40(3), 61-83. https://doi.org/10.1145/1592401.1592407
Molinillo, S., Aguilar-Illescas, R., Anaya-Sánchez, R., & Vallespín-Arán, M. (2018). Exploring the impacts of interactions, social presence, and emotional engagement on active collaborative learning in a social web-based environment. Computers & Education, 123, 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.012
Naimi-Akbar, I., Weurlander, M., & Barman, L. (2023). Teaching-learning in virtual environments: Forced compromises and inclusive challenges. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 3(2), 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2023.2201674
Norman, D. A. (2020). The design of everyday things (Revised and Expanded ed.). Basic Books.
Odriozola-González, P., Planchuelo-Gómez, Á., Irurtia, M. J., & de Luis-García, R. (2020). Psychological effects of the COVID-19 outbreak and lockdown among students and workers of a Spanish university. Psychiatry Research, 290, 113108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113108
Redmond, P., Heffernan, A., Abawi, L., Brown, A., & Henderson, R. (2018). An online engagement framework for higher education. Online Learning, 22(1), 183-204. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175
Richardson, J. C., & Lowenthal, P. (2017). Instructor social presence: Learners' needs and a neglected component of the community of inquiry framework. In Social Presence in Online Learning (pp. 86-98). Routledge.
Rotter, J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35(4), 651-665.
Rovai, A. P. (2002). Building sense of community in virtual learning environments. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v3i1.79
Shea, P., Li, C. S., & Pickett, A. (2006). A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(3), 175-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.06.005
Stelitano, L., Doan, S., Woo, A., Diliberti, M. K., Kaufman, J. H., & Henry, D. (2020). The digital divide and COVID-19: Teachers' perceptions of inequities in students' internet access and participation in remote learning. RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/RRA134-3
Sutcliffe, M., & Noble, K. (2022). Belonging, trust and social isolation: The move online during the time of COVID–A longitudinal study. Heliyon, 8(9), e10356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10356
Swan, K., Garrison, D. R., & Richardson, J. C. (2009). A constructivist approach to online learning: The community of inquiry framework. In C. Howard (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Distance Learning (pp. 328-337). IGI Global.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70(4), 547-593. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070004547
Van Heerden, R., Cilliers, L., & Isabirye, N. (2023). A trust framework to improve adoption of mobile banking by university students. Journal of Contemporary Management, 20(1), 38-58. https://doi.org/10.35683/jcm21066.184
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wickens, C. D. (2013). Cognitive neuroscience and human performance: A practical guide. Psychology Press.
Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2011). Mass media research: An introduction (9th ed.). Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Woldeab, D., Punti, G., & Bohannon, R. (2023). The lived experiences of adult learners in an individualized program: Empowerment, responsibility, tensions, and anxiety. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 29(2), 524-543.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Benjamin Boison, Anne Burke
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published by CJESS are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This license permits third parties to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon the original work provided that the original work and source is appropriately cited.