Improving Teaching and Learning in Large Classes in Kenyan Primary: Creating Interaction Opportunities for Learners – An Action Research

Ruth Otienoh

doi:10.53103/cjess.v4i2.226

Authors

Ruth Otienoh Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology, Kenya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53103/cjess.v4i2.226

Keywords:

Large Classes, Interaction, Pair Work, Group Work, Acion Research

Abstract

The introduction of Free Primary Education in Kenya in 2003 resulted in large class of about 50- 100 learners. Teachers were not prepared, nor were they supported o effectively teach and handle these classes. Teaching and learning in these classes is generally teacher centred, associated with whole class instruction, lecturing and other expository methods with minimal learner interaction, resulting in rote learning. This study sought to improve teaching and learning in large classes by creating opportunities for learner interaction. Collaborative action research with four teachers in two schools in Nairobi was adapted. This paper is based on the action research process of which pair work and group work was improved upon to create interaction opportunities for learners. Findings indicate that unlike the reconnaissance stage, which was dominated by Teacher Led Recitation (TLR) with minimal learners’ interaction engagement, there were more activities of pair work, teacher elicitation and seat work. Moreover, teachers were able to diversify the type of questions asked to cater for creation of interaction opportunities among learners.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ackers, J., & Hardman, F. (2010). Classroom interaction in Kenyan primary schools. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 31(2), 245-261.

Abdi-Kadir, J., & Hardman, F. (2007). The discourse of whole class teaching: A comparative study of Kenyan and Nigerian Primary English Lessons. Language and Education, 21 (2), 1-15.

Gillies, R. M., & Ashman, A. F. (2003). The social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups London: Routledge Falmer p.36-53.

Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. (1995). Contemporary educational psychology 5th Ed. New York: Longman

Hardman, F., Abd-Kadir, J., Agg, C., Migwi, J., Ndambuki, J., & Smith, F. (2009). Changing pedagogical practice in Kenyan primary schools: The impact of school-based training. Journal of comparative Education, 45 (1), 65-86.

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Retallick, J. (2004). The action research planner (2nd edition, Revised) Karachi: Aga Khan University Institute for Educational Development

Motseke, M., & Maja M. M. (2019). Classroom Interaction: A Problem in the Teaching of English to Non-Native English Speakers. The International Journal of Literacies 26 (1), 49-56.

Pontefract, C., & Hardman, F. (2005). The discourse of classroom interaction in Kenyan primary school. Comparative Education, 41(1), 87-106.

Pritchard, A. (2006). Ways of learning: Learning theories and learning styles in the classroom. New York, David Fulton Publishers

Robinson, H. A. (1994). The ethnography of empowerment: The transformative power of classroom interaction. London, the Falmer Press.

Robson, C. (2002). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers Second Ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing

Santrock, J. W. (2004). Educational psychology. 2nd Ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill

Stringer, E. (2007). Action research (3rd ed.) London: Sage Publications

van't Erve, D. (2003). Classes in Kenya overcrowded since free education: Teachers working double shifts. The Magazine of the Dutch Teachers Union (AOb), 6 September 2003

Vebriyanto, D. A. (2015). Teachers’ questions in EFL Classroom interaction. Vision Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning, 4(2), 279-302.