A Comparative Analysis of Productivity Improvement Techniques in Educational Institution of Holy Cross College
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53103/cjess.v1i1.2Keywords:
Enhancing Productivity, Improving Efficiency, Boosting Performance, Organizational CommitmentAbstract
This study aims to explore and evaluate productivity improvement techniques that have a significant impact on the performance of faculty employees at Holy Cross College's Education Institution. The considered techniques are named as follows: Technology-based, Employee-Based, Material-Based, Process-Based, Product-Based, and Task-Based. Participants include Holy Cross College's teaching personnel. This study utilized an online survey with questionnaire that aims to identify the level of provision and level of importance of each productivity improvement techniques. The collected data were organized and used Related-Samples Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks to evaluate the rank-ordered data set productivity improvement techniques premised on common criteria of faculty assigned roles. Additionally, Paired Sample Statistics, Correlation and Test were conducted to find out the relationship of productivity improvement techniques’ level of provision and importance. The findings and recommendations for the possible integration of productivity enhancement techniques that should be highlighted and maintained in educational institutions were given. Results shown the task-based approach is the most commonly utilized and preferred productivity improvement technique among teachers. While the technology-based strategy has the highest correlation in this pandemic period.
Downloads
References
Bandyopadhyay, J. K., & Lichtman, R. (2007). Six Sigma approach to quality and productivity improvement in an institution for higher education in the United States. International Journal of Management, 24(4), 802.
Bisson, B. (2021, August 25). 8 ways to increase productivity in the workplace. Business Town. Retrieved September 14, 2021, from https://businesstown.com/8-ways-increase-productivity-workplace/.
Boel, B. (2003). The European Productivity agency and transatlantic Relations: 1953-1961. Museum Tusculanum Press.
DeLorenzo, R., Johnson, J., & Dykes, G. (2011). Productivity in Education. https://doi.org/http://www.effdebate.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/productivity-in-education.pdf
Duby, J. J. (1994). Industry productivity improvement techniques for education: A reverse technology transfer? Nato Asi Series F Computer and Systems Sciences, 135, 9-9.
Duran, C., Cetindere, A., & Aksu, Y. E. (2015). Productivity improvement by work and time study technique for earth energy-glass manufacturing company. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 109-113.
Hanushek, E. A., & Ettema, E. (2017). Defining productivity in education: Issues and illustrations. The American Economist, 62(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0569434516688207
Hawkins, L., & Knowledge, P. (2001). Fundamental Productivity Improvement Tools and Techniques for SME. Loughborough, Pera Knowledge, (33).
Hilgert, R. L. (1964). Modern organization theory and business management thought. American Behavioral Scientist, 8(2), 25-29.
Kumar, S. A., & Suresh, N. (2008). Production and operations management (with skill development, caselets and cases). New Age International (P) Ltd., Publishers.
Learning and teaching materials. Learning and teaching materials | Unesco IIEP Learning Portal. (n.d.). Retrieved September 14, 2021, from https://learningportal.iiep.unesco.org/en/issue-briefs/improve-learning/learning-and-teaching-materials.
Lunenburg, F. C. (2011). Goal-setting theory of motivation. International Journal of Management, Business, and Administration, 15(1), 1-6.
Mason, R. O. (1979). A general systems theory of productivity. International Journal of General System, 5(1), 17-30.
News. IspatGuru. (n.d.). Retrieved September 18, 2021, from https://www.ispatguru.com/employee-productivity-and-its-influencing-factors/.
Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A literature review on impact of covid-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120983481
Santos, J. V., & Gallardo, D. L. (2021). Ergonomic hazards in the workplace: Assessment, evaluation and prevention in the educational environment of Holy Cross College. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 04(07). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v4-i7-11
Santos, J. V. L. (2021). Contingency Theories of Leadership: Effectiveness of the College Instructor’s Leadership Style. Educatio: Journal of Education, 6(2), 107-113.
Subia, E. G. S., Jocson, E. J. C., & Florencondia, E. N. T. (2019). Flood prevention and mitigation initiatives towards a flood-free city. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences (ASRJETS), 58(1), 215-224.
Use of technology in teaching and learning. Use of Technology in Teaching and Learning | U.S. Department of Education. (n.d.). https://www.ed.gov/oii-news/use-technology-teaching-and-learning.
Yoshifumi, H., Sammogram, S., & Manzuma-Nd, N. M. (2017). Effect of productivity and perceived quality on organizational performance from lean management practice perspective. Research Journal of Business Management, 12(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3923/rjbm.2018.1.9
critical factors Affecting employee productivity at WORK - Sage HR Blog. Sage HR Blog | Easy to implement HR tips! Retrieved on September 12, 2021 from https://blog.sage.hr/5-critical-factors-affecting-employee-productivity-at-work/.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 John Santos, Joefil Jocson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published by CJESS are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This license permits third parties to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon the original work provided that the original work and source is appropriately cited.
