Language Theses and Dissertation Landscapes: An Analysis of Research Analyses


  • Fermilyn D Adais Nueva Vizcaya State University, Philippines
  • Kara S Panolong Benguet State University, Philippines



Content Analysis, Systematic Review, Language Research, Theses, Dissertations, Research Features


Content analysis of language research is one of the very widely researched topics worldwide. However, in the Philippine context, few studies and systematic reviews on the content analysis of language theses and dissertations are published. The current study examined the features of 25 studies that looked at the content of language theses and dissertations published from 2016 to 2021. Thematic focus, study design, data analysis methodologies, and research outcomes were all investigated. The findings show that research trends, research parts, rhetorical structures, and linguistic structures are the most commonly discussed topics. Content analysis is the most widely used methodology and data analysis approach. It is worth noting that only one of the reviewed studies produced a research output. Recommended topics and areas for future language research are offered.


Abrami, P. C., Cohen, P. A., & D’Apollonia, S. (1988). Implementation problems in meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 58(2), 151-179.

Akbas, R. D. (2021). A systematic review of the ESP (English for Specific Purposes)-based post-graduate research in Turkey. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(22), 369-387.

AlHarbi, A. A. (2019). Research trends in the Field of TEFL at Saudi universities: an analytical study for selected MA theses and Ph.D. Dissertations. Dirasat, Educational Sciences, 46(1), 634-646.

Alotaibi, H. S. (2018). Metadiscourse in dissertation acknowledgments: Exploration of gender differences in EFL texts. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18, 899-916.

Andresen, M., & Zinsmeister, H. (2018). Stylistic differences between closely related disciplines: Metadiscourse in German linguistics and literary studies. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice.

Atmaca, C. (2016). Comparison of hedges in M.A. theses and PH.D. dissertations in ELT. ZfWT, 8(2), 309-325.

Bailey, A., & Corrales, A. A. (2020). Insight into Novice Research: A Critical Review of ELT Master's Theses. MEXTESOL Journal, 44(4), n4.

Bani-Khaled, T. A. A. D. (2012). Jordanian English language research: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(14), 55-66.

Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B. A., Budgen, D., Turner, M., & Khalil, M. (2007). Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. Journal of systems and software, 80(4), 571-583.

BeckerGuides: Research impact: Outputs and activities. (2022, May 6). BeckerGuides at Becker Medical Library.

Chaiyasook, W., & Jaroongkhongdach, W. (2014). A content analysis of Thai master’s theses in ELT from 2003 to 2011. In Proceedings of the International Conference: DRAL, 2, 64-74.

Chen, Y. (2013). Master’s and Doctoral Theses on Second Language Writing: A Survey of the Emerging Voices in China. Masters Theses. 66.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge.

Content analysis. (n.d.). Columbia Public Health |.

Cope, D. G. (2014). Computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(3), 322-323.

Dayag, D. T., & Dita, S. N. (2012). Linguistic research in the Philippines:Trends, prospects, and challenges. Philippine Social Sciences: Capacities, Directions, and Challenges, 110-126.

Dollah, S., Abduh, A., & Rosmaladewi, M. (2017). Benefits and drawbacks of NVivo QSR application. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education, Science, and Technology (ICEST 2017).

Doğan, F. Ş., Yağız, O., & Kaçar, I. G. (2018). An investigation of the citation transformation types in M.A. and PhD theses. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14(1).

Ebadi, S., Salman, A. R., Nguyen, T. T. L., & Weisi, H. (2019). Rhetorical Structure Variations in Abstracts and Introductions of Applied Linguistics Master's Theses by Iraqi and International Students. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 7(1), 101-117. (n.d.).

Erdogan, T. (2015). Research trends in dissertations on PBL: A content analysis study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 308-315.

Feeney, M. (2017). Understanding news researchers through a content analysis of dissertations and theses. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 3(1), 263-270.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (Vol. 7, p. 429). New York: McGraw-hill.

Getkham, K. (2016). Authorial stance in Thai students’ doctoral dissertation. English Language Teaching, 9(3), 80.

Giritlioglu, İ. (2014). A content analysis on the subjects of hospitality PhD dissertations in Turkey. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 13(24228), 353-358.

Gursoy, E., & Özcan, E. N. (2021). Finding and minding the gaps for language education in Turkey: A content analysis on doctoral dissertations in ELT programs from 2010-2020. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi, 17(2), 830-847.

Horton, E. G., & Hawkins, M. (2010). A content analysis of intervention research in social work doctoral dissertations. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 7(5), 377-386.

Iphofen, R. (2011). Research rationale — Justifiable interventions. Ethical Decision-Making in Social Research, 18-26.

Jansen, D., & Warren, K. (2020, June). What is research methodology? Simple definition (With examples). Grad Coach.

Jawad, F. M. (2018). Genre analysis of MA thesis abstracts by native and (Iraqi) non-native speakers of English. Journal of University of Babylon for Humanities, 26(1), 37-50.

John, W. S., & Johnson, P. (2000). The pros and cons of data analysis software for qualitative research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 32(4), 393-397.

Karadag, E. (2010). An analysis of research methods and statistical techniques used by doctoral dissertation at the Education Sciences in Turkey. Current Issues in Education, 13(4), 1-19.

Kemal Sinan, O. (2016). Rhetorical analysis of the doctoral abstracts on English language teaching in Turkey. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 6(1), 25.

Kirmizi, O. (2012). Research trends in M.A. ELT programs in Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4687-4691.

Koroglu, Z. (2018). A study on metadiscoursive interaction in the doctoral dissertations of the native speakers of English and the Turkish speakers of English. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(3), 396-404.

Koçyiğit, M., & Erdem, C. (2018). A content analysis of graduate research on English preparatory programs at universities. Journal of Human Sciences, 15(3), 1466-1480.

Lam, R. W., & Kennedy, S. H. (2005). Using Metaanalysis to evaluate evidence: Practical tips and traps. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 50(3), 167-174.

Latif, M. M. (2018). English language teaching research in Egypt: Trends and challenges. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39(9), 818-829.

Lesson 4 literature review - Albacite,cyrene VALYNNEKATE ALBACITE bsba 3b-mm.docx. (2021, July 29). Course Hero | Make every study hour count. Https://Www.Coursehero.Com/File/101832766/Lesson-4-Literature-Review-Albacitecyrene-Valynnekate-Albacite-Bsba-3B-Mmdocx/

Lin, L. C., & Cheng, C. P. (2010). Research trends in selected MA TESOL programs in Taiwan: A preliminary content analysis of master’s theses from 2003-2007. Asian EFL Journal, 12(4), 126-139.

Luo, A. (2019, July 18). Content analysis | A step-by-step guide with examples. Scribbr.

Massoum, Y. H., & Yazdanmehr, E. (2019). A genre-analysis of the discussion section of Iranian and English ELT theses: A comparative study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(12), 1611-1623.

Mauludini, Y. R., & Kurniawan, E. (2020). Analysis of move and linguistic features in Indonesian and English humanities dissertation abstracts. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2020).

Meline, T. (2006). Selecting studies for systemic review: Inclusion and exclusion criteria. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 33(Spring), 21-27.

Miville, M. L., Mendez, N., & Louie, M. (2017). Latina/o gender roles: A content analysis of empirical research from 1982 to 2013. Journal of Latina/o Psychology, 5(3), 173-194.

Motha, S. (2009). Review of doctoral research in second-language teaching and learning in the United States (2006–2007). Language Teaching, 42(2), 234-255.

Neuendorf, K. A. (2016). The content analysis guidebook. SAGE.

Nguyen, L. T., & Pramoolsook, I. (2016). Citations in literature review chapters of TESOL master’s theses by Vietnamese postgraduates. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 16(2), 17-32.

Okoli, C., & Schabram, K. (2010). A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems Research.

Othman, A. K. (2018). Genre analysis: Investigation of Saudi EFL learners' PhD dissertation acknowledgements in the field of Applied Linguistics. International Journal of English Language, Literature and Translation Studies (IJELR), 5(2), 50-56.

Ozmen, K. S., Cephe, P. T., & Kinik, B. (2016). Trends in doctoral research on English language teaching in Turkey. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16(5), 1737-1759.

Ozudogru, F. (2018). Analysis of curriculum evaluation studies conducted in foreign language education: 2005-2016. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(2), 113-134.

Pala, Zeah Nestlé O. CMC.docx - A systematic study of the acquisition of movies as a second language introduction the English language has been the | Course hero. (2021, April 15). Course Hero | Make every study hour count.

Panolong, K. S. (2018). Tracing trends, challenges and prospects in theses on English as a second language. Asian EFL Journal, 20(12.4), 53-71.

Piotrowski, C., & Guyette, R. (2014). Graduate students' research interest in business ethics: A study of dissertations. College Student Journal, 48(2), 2331-233.

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2010). Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: Myths and strategies. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47(11), 1451-1458.

Porras, A. (2019). Exploring the genre of undergraduate teacher education acknowledgments. Academic Journal Perspective: Education, Language, and Literature, 7(1), 41.

Porras, A., & Ingilan, S. (2017). Genre analysis of linguistics research introductions. University of Mindanao International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 2(1).

Powell, S. T., Allison, M. A., & Kalichman, M. W. (2007). Effectiveness of a responsible conduct of research course: A preliminary study. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13(2), 249-264.

Randolph, J. J., Gaiek, L. S., White, T. A., Slappey, L. A., Chastain, A., Prejean-Harris, R., & Hansard, C. (2012). A Quantitative Content Analysis of Mercer University. Georgia Educational Researcher, 9(1).

Research methodology and the execution of Slr. (n.d.). Homework Help and Textbook Solutions | bartleby.

Research output. (n.d.). Policy and Procedure Library - University of Southern Queensland.,journal%20articles%E2%80%94refereed%2C%20scholarly%20journal

Ross, S. M., Morrison, G. R., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Educational technology research past and present: Balancing rigor and relevance to impact school learning. Contemporary Educational Technology, 1(1).

Sampson, P., & Gresham, G. (2017). The US school superintendent gender research gap continues: Content analysis of 2014-2016 dissertations. International Journal of Technology and Inclusive Education.

Sandorova, Z. (2019). Content Analysis as a Research Method in Investigating the Cultural Components in Foreign Language Textbooks [Review of Content Analysis as a Research Method in Investigating the Cultural Components in Foreign Language Textbooks]. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 1, 95-128.

Sharp, D. (2002). Kipling's guide to writing a scientific paper. Croatian Medical Journal, 43(3), 262-267.

Shehzad, W., & Abbas, A. (2016). Genre analysis of generic section headings of MPhil theses' introduction section of linguistics and literature 41(1), 67. NUML Journal of Critical Inquiry, 41(1), 67-86.

Shirani, S., & Chalak, A. (2016). A genre analysis study of Iranian EFL learners’ master theses with a focus on the introduction section. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(10), 1982-1987.

Solak, E. (2014). The Content Analysis of the Research Papers on Foreign Language Education in Turkey. Online Submission, 3(3), 167-178.

Solmaz, O. (2021). Educational technology research trends in Turkey: Investigating graduate theses in English language teaching. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 9(17), 102-124.

Temel, C., Kartal, M., Pehlevan, Z., & Namlı, A. (2016). A research on the methods and analysis techniques of the postgraduate theses and dissertations on sports in Turkey. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(1), 78-86.

Tullay, R. B. (2019). Exploring research areas in language education dissertation. Asian EFL Journal, 21(2.4), 205-225.

Tůma, F., & Píšová, M. (2013). Trends in Foreign Language Didactics research: a thematic Analysis of PhD Dissertations from the Czech Republic and Abroad (2006–2012). The New Educational Review, 34(4), 125-138.

(n.d.). University College Dublin.

Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. SAGE.

What is considered a research output? (n.d.). Support.

Woods, M., Paulus, T., Atkins, D. P., & Macklin, R. (2016). Advancing qualitative research using qualitative data analysis software (QDAS)? Reviewing potential versus practice in published studies using ATLAS.ti and NVivo, 1994–2013. Social Science Computer Review, 34(5), 597-617.

Wuttisrisiriporn, N. (2017). Comparative rhetorical organization of ELT thesis introductions composed by Thai and American students. English Language Teaching, 10(12), 1-14.

Yang, W. (2013). Genre analysis of dissertation acknowledgements: A comparative study across contexts. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 19(2), 27-40.

Yetkiner, A., Acar Erdol, T., & Ünlü, Ş. (2019). Content analysis regarding curriculum evaluation PhD dissertations (1996-2017). Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 246-270.

Zand, M. A., & Meihami, H. (2016). A rhetorical move analysis of TEFL thesis abstracts: The case of Allameh Tabataba’i University. Issues in Language Teaching (ILT), 5(1), 1-23.




How to Cite

Adais, F. D., & Panolong, K. S. (2022). Language Theses and Dissertation Landscapes: An Analysis of Research Analyses. Canadian Journal of Educational and Social Studies, 2(4), 1–22.